Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Short treatise on M1 Garand front sights

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    125
    Rep Power
    0

    Lightbulb Short treatise on M1 Garand front sights

    About six months ago, I ordered a year of vintage NRA American Rifleman magazines off of ebay. The year I ordered was 1960, all twelve issues. I was not born yet when those came out. The reason I ordered those 1960 American Rifleman magazines was, I wanted to read them and get a feel for the gun politics vibes and tones and thoughts of NRA members from that era. And compare it to that of ten years later, around 1968 when the LBJ Gun Control Act was passed. Which is what the NICS background check system is based off of (questions on the NICS are based on the 1968 GCA law). I also wanted to view the ads from way back then.

    But when reading those old NRA American Rifleman mags, I came across multiple gems of info that had nothing to do with encroaching gun control. One is a small "Dope Bag" Q & A on "M1 Target Sights" in the May 1960 American Rifleman. It was answered by E.H. Harrison, a tech advisor/writer in the then American Rifleman magazine. I found it interesting since I own an M1 Garand and I thought it might be interesting for some others to read.

    "M1 TARGET SIGHTS

    A member of our rifle club who attended the 1957 National Matches tells me that some of the M1 rifles used in the matches were equipped with front sights different from standard. I remember that about 30 years ago there was a stir about what was called the Marine Corps front sight for the Springfield rifle. Is this new M1 front sight the same thing? D.N.Y.

    Answer: This front sight for the M1 rifle was worked up in a series of tests by the U.S. Army Rifle Team during the summer of 1956. The "Marine Corps" front sight of the 1920's, to which you refer, was materially wider than the standard Springfield sight, being used in widths of .1"or sometimes more. It was considered by its users to afford more uniform sight alignment, especially in elevation. The merits of this wide front sight were strongly praised by some of the leading big bore shooters of the time.

    The new target front sight for the M1 rifle is exactly opposite. While the standard sight blade is .084" wide, the special sight of 1957 was made .062". It is considered to have the advantages of covering less of the target, and allowing the shooter to see wider white portions of the target on each side of the blade. This narrow sight or its equivalent was used by Service teams generally during the 1957 National Matches. Also the Ordnance Officer of the National Matches had a supply for attachment to the rifles of other competitors who requested it.

    Both Army and Marine Corps have made careful tests of front sight width for target purposes. The Army concluded that, while a width of .060" could often be used to advantage, it was too narrow for best seeing under certain light conditions, and the sight should be manufactured .065". The Marine Corps, testing in a different part of the country, preferred .060". The target sight, therefore, will be manufactured to .062" width to meet all conditions, and it can be slightly narrowed if desired. Regulations now permit the use in competition of M1 front sights between .055" and .084" wide.

    The special dimensions of front sights are for target shooting only. There is no change in the Service sights, which are intended for use under all Service conditions.-E.H.H."
    Last edited by MrTwistedFock; 10-18-2019 at 11:10 PM.
    All M1 Garand rifles coming into the CMP's possession for resale, should be sold only to buyers who have shot an M1 Garand at a registered M1 match once a year. M1 Garand sales to non shooters should cease completely and immediately. If you want to buy M1s, you should be REQUIRED to shoot minimum one formal match per year, every year.

    RT40 (banned permanently) from the CMP forum

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    N.E. Texas
    Posts
    151
    Rep Power
    9
    The American Rifleman from a generation (?) ago are as close to a time machine for this subject as I can imagine!!

    JGW

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    125
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JGW View Post
    The American Rifleman from a generation (?) ago are as close to a time machine for this subject as I can imagine!!

    JGW
    That American Rifleman was a 1960 American Rifleman. You are talking over two generations back, not one. The gun politics discussed in those old issues are totally different than today. The articles are written better, the grammar is better. Gun control is discussed in most of the issues as if it was a "what if" issue and dismissed as extremely bad and as unAmerican.

    The ads in the 1960 issues are full of endless mail order rifles, service rifles included. M1 Garands, surplus this, surplus that.

    In other words, our generation...we got screwed.
    All M1 Garand rifles coming into the CMP's possession for resale, should be sold only to buyers who have shot an M1 Garand at a registered M1 match once a year. M1 Garand sales to non shooters should cease completely and immediately. If you want to buy M1s, you should be REQUIRED to shoot minimum one formal match per year, every year.

    RT40 (banned permanently) from the CMP forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •