Sure looks like it to me.
Sure looks like it to me.
M1CC Member #111
NRA Member
Now either I can scare up the rest of the parts to go with it or give it up to Jon?
When dealing with liberals, always attribute to malice what would ordinarily be attributed to incompetence.
"Of course it won't be easy; nothing worthwhile ever is. That is why I have always failed where others have succeeded."-Clouseau
Is this one as well? It currently resides on my 5.62 HRA.
Jon
Stu,
Wanna' trade? I'm game.
Jon
Would an HRA and IHC be the same if both were made by Kileen?
Jon
When dealing with liberals, always attribute to malice what would ordinarily be attributed to incompetence.
"Of course it won't be easy; nothing worthwhile ever is. That is why I have always failed where others have succeeded."-Clouseau
When dealing with liberals, always attribute to malice what would ordinarily be attributed to incompetence.
"Of course it won't be easy; nothing worthwhile ever is. That is why I have always failed where others have succeeded."-Clouseau
Jon,
I checked my original 4.66 HRA from "Mac" MacCollums collection that is supposed to be original according to Duff. The buttplate on it doesn't look like the ones I'm calling IHC. I just checked my two collector grade IHC's (with CMP certs) and both of them have what I have been calling an IHC buttplate.
I looked in Babcock's book and he doesn't picture any IHC butt plates but does show a couple of HRA plates. Both of the pictures of the HRA's are with the door closed. One picture is of the back and it looks to be straight in that area not rounded like the IHC's.
M1CC Member #111
NRA Member