timshufflin
09-24-2012, 09:36 PM
We have some big votes coming up in MI this year. There is a huge attempt at a union power grab for a couple of the resolutions being voted on. Our Michigan Constitution is up for grabs, get ready.
Proposal 1: A REFERENDUM ON PUBLIC ACT 4 OF 2011 – THE EMERGENCY MANAGER LAW
Public Act 4 of 2011 would:
• Establish criteria to assess the financial condition of local government units,
including school districts.
• Authorize Governor to appoint an emergency manager (EM) upon state finding
of a financial emergency, and allow the EM to act in place of local government
officials.
• Require EM to develop financial and operating plans, which may include
modification or termination of contracts, reorganization of government, and
determination of expenditures, services, and use of assets until the emergency is
resolved.
• Alternatively, authorize state-appointed review team to enter into a local
government approved consent decree.
Should this law be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 2: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
This proposal would:
• Grant public and private employees the constitutional right to organize and bargain collectively through labor unions.
• Invalidate existing or future state or local laws that limit the ability to join unions and bargain collectively, and to negotiate and enforce collective bargaining agreements, including employees’ financial support of their labor unions. Laws may be enacted to prohibit public employees from striking.
• Override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.
• Define “employer” as a person or entity employing one or more employees.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 3: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH A STANDARD FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
This proposal would:
• Require electric utilities to provide at least 25% of their annual retail sales of
electricity from renewable energy sources, which are wind, solar, biomass, and
hydropower, by 2025.
• Limit to not more than 1% per year electric utility rate increases charged to
consumers only to achieve compliance with the renewable energy standard.
• Allow annual extensions of the deadline to meet the 25% standard in order to
prevent rate increases over the 1% limit.
• Require the legislature to enact additional laws to encourage the use of Michigan
made equipment and employment of Michigan residents.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 4: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH THE MICHIGAN QUALITY HOME CARE COUNCIL AND PROVIDE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR IN-HOME CARE WORKERS
This proposal would:
• Allow in-home care workers to bargain collectively with the Michigan Quality
Home Care Council (MQHCC). Continue the current exclusive representative of
in-home care workers until modified in accordance with labor laws.
• Require MQHCC to provide training for in-home care workers, create a registry
of workers who pass background checks, and provide financial services to
patients to manage the cost of in-home care.
• Preserve patients’ rights to hire in-home care workers who are not referred from the MQHCC registry who are bargaining unit members.
• Authorize the MQHCC to set minimum compensation standards and terms and
conditions of employment.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 5: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT THE ENACTMENT OF NEW TAXES BY STATE GOVERNMENT
This proposal would:
Require a 2/3 majority vote of the State House and the State Senate, or a statewide vote
of the people at a November election, in order for the State of Michigan to impose new or
additional taxes on taxpayers or expand the base of taxation or increasing the rate of
taxation.
This section shall in no way be construed to limit or modify tax limitations otherwise
created in this Constitution.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 6: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS
This proposal would:
• Require the approval of a majority of voters at a statewide election and in each
municipality where “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” are to be located before the State of Michigan may expend state funds or resources for acquiring land, designing, soliciting bids for, constructing, financing, or promoting new international bridges or tunnels.
• Create a definition of “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” that means, “any bridge or tunnel which is not open to the public and serving traffic as of January 1, 2012.”
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 1: A REFERENDUM ON PUBLIC ACT 4 OF 2011 – THE EMERGENCY MANAGER LAW
Public Act 4 of 2011 would:
• Establish criteria to assess the financial condition of local government units,
including school districts.
• Authorize Governor to appoint an emergency manager (EM) upon state finding
of a financial emergency, and allow the EM to act in place of local government
officials.
• Require EM to develop financial and operating plans, which may include
modification or termination of contracts, reorganization of government, and
determination of expenditures, services, and use of assets until the emergency is
resolved.
• Alternatively, authorize state-appointed review team to enter into a local
government approved consent decree.
Should this law be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 2: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
This proposal would:
• Grant public and private employees the constitutional right to organize and bargain collectively through labor unions.
• Invalidate existing or future state or local laws that limit the ability to join unions and bargain collectively, and to negotiate and enforce collective bargaining agreements, including employees’ financial support of their labor unions. Laws may be enacted to prohibit public employees from striking.
• Override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.
• Define “employer” as a person or entity employing one or more employees.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 3: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH A STANDARD FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
This proposal would:
• Require electric utilities to provide at least 25% of their annual retail sales of
electricity from renewable energy sources, which are wind, solar, biomass, and
hydropower, by 2025.
• Limit to not more than 1% per year electric utility rate increases charged to
consumers only to achieve compliance with the renewable energy standard.
• Allow annual extensions of the deadline to meet the 25% standard in order to
prevent rate increases over the 1% limit.
• Require the legislature to enact additional laws to encourage the use of Michigan
made equipment and employment of Michigan residents.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 4: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH THE MICHIGAN QUALITY HOME CARE COUNCIL AND PROVIDE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR IN-HOME CARE WORKERS
This proposal would:
• Allow in-home care workers to bargain collectively with the Michigan Quality
Home Care Council (MQHCC). Continue the current exclusive representative of
in-home care workers until modified in accordance with labor laws.
• Require MQHCC to provide training for in-home care workers, create a registry
of workers who pass background checks, and provide financial services to
patients to manage the cost of in-home care.
• Preserve patients’ rights to hire in-home care workers who are not referred from the MQHCC registry who are bargaining unit members.
• Authorize the MQHCC to set minimum compensation standards and terms and
conditions of employment.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 5: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT THE ENACTMENT OF NEW TAXES BY STATE GOVERNMENT
This proposal would:
Require a 2/3 majority vote of the State House and the State Senate, or a statewide vote
of the people at a November election, in order for the State of Michigan to impose new or
additional taxes on taxpayers or expand the base of taxation or increasing the rate of
taxation.
This section shall in no way be construed to limit or modify tax limitations otherwise
created in this Constitution.
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)
Proposal 6: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS
This proposal would:
• Require the approval of a majority of voters at a statewide election and in each
municipality where “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” are to be located before the State of Michigan may expend state funds or resources for acquiring land, designing, soliciting bids for, constructing, financing, or promoting new international bridges or tunnels.
• Create a definition of “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” that means, “any bridge or tunnel which is not open to the public and serving traffic as of January 1, 2012.”
Should this proposal be approved? (Yes or No)