Bob W
08-08-2018, 12:46 PM
Link to an article about George Young, a vet who began his 2nd amendment battle in 2008 against Hawaii. It's Reuters, so I have generally found them fairly credible. With the help (pro bono) of a CALIFORNIA lawyer named Alan Beck, he has won a victory (July 24) in the lib 9th circuit which may necessitate a "landmark" Supreme Court ruling. The NRA wouldn't help as they said they were already involved in carry litigation, but they "applaud" the ruling. BFD.
Neither Young nor the lawyer, Beck, appear to have the means for this battle, but Beck is borrowing from his family to continue the fight. I have not researched this fully yet, but I intend to do so, and if I can verify this info
I will of course renew my NRA membership as always, but instead of any extra contributions to NRA/CRPA this year I'm going to find this guy and send a check.
Guy has balls, he started this during a discussion of the Constitution to show his daughter they couldn't take his rights. She died in a car accident and he is carrying on in remembrance of her.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-hawaii/unlikely-pair-could-usher-gun-rights-case-to-u-s-supreme-court-idUSKBN1KT13B
Here's the link to the court opinion- appears valid so far
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf
Neither Young nor the lawyer, Beck, appear to have the means for this battle, but Beck is borrowing from his family to continue the fight. I have not researched this fully yet, but I intend to do so, and if I can verify this info
I will of course renew my NRA membership as always, but instead of any extra contributions to NRA/CRPA this year I'm going to find this guy and send a check.
Guy has balls, he started this during a discussion of the Constitution to show his daughter they couldn't take his rights. She died in a car accident and he is carrying on in remembrance of her.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-hawaii/unlikely-pair-could-usher-gun-rights-case-to-u-s-supreme-court-idUSKBN1KT13B
Here's the link to the court opinion- appears valid so far
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf