Certainly you jest. Mrs. Clinton would NEVER do such a thing, being the fine, upstanding representative that she is. NOT!!!!! We really need to find a way to get rid of Bloomberg and Schumer.
Jon
Printable View
One of the differences between brady and the other anti-gunners, is none of those other anti-gunners really have any personal legal standing to do something about gun stuff. brady had some legal standing to be involved in the anti-gun movement, hence the brady anti-gun organization was created. And brady pushed for stuff all thru the eighties and early nineties and she got a lot of what she wanted, in the end. By 1993, the Brady Act was passed.
None of those other people have ever been directly impacted by a firearm caused crime or accident, that Im aware of. Its less personal for those other anti-gunners. It was all very personal for brady and she made that clear, she was driven to ban and control firearms after her husband was shot.