Printable View
What is the function of "the royal family"? The british have their own financial problems and yet they insist on supporting in lavish style generation after generation of total parasites. I think if any one of the "royals" ever had to work just 1 day they would probably die of the shock.
Even with upkeep on the palaces, they still cost a lot less than the obama bunch!
Eli
They say the upkeep comes out to almost $1 per year per subject. I wouldn't give them the sweat off my balls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli
I just read that the brits claim it costs only 75mil a year but, there is some creative book keeping involved, while the obamas cost the US taxpayers 1.4 billion!
Those Brits are crazy over those royals and many see nothing wrong with their lavish spending.I am not a fan of spendies,but at least Harry was active duty,and tried to be"normal".
Active duty? When the two parasites showed up, one said "I want to fly a bloody Harrier", and the other said "I want to fly a bloody helicopter". I guess the brits honor special requests.
Imagine being born and NEVER having to do anything remotely productive for the rest of your life!!! That is the life of a royal.
You mean the travel and social schedule isn't a productive endeavor?Quote:
Originally Posted by Punch The Clown
I stand corrected. They are "good will ambassadors". Well, for an unlimited expense account I'll travel around spreading a little good will too.Quote:
Originally Posted by cuppednlocked
I was just reading about lend-lease! I figured they're probably spending money that they owe us on the royals, but get this!. The brits charged us rent for all our airfields and bases in england during WWII! So, when American airmen were dying to defend their monarchy, the parasites were charging us rent!! What big nuts they have!
Stu,just relax,and have a meat pie.I wish the news wasn't so plastered with this kid,but who cares about our troubles,we gotta know what it's name is!It makes me sad that this is more important coverage than anything. :(